Sometimes this category is chock-full of old reliables like Randy Newman (with his latest knockoff of the toilet-paper jingle he wrote in 1977) or Elton John (with another attempt to get all the way through a film composition without having to use more than four or maybe five keys on the piano, tops). Often, though, there's a Name or even two Names thrown in.
Here we have two: Sting and Paul "How'd My Hair Get That Color All Of A Sudden?" McCartney.
(Okay, that's uncalled for. But how disappointing. I thought he was committed to the idea that Sir Paul McDamnedCartney can have long, gray hair and still be Sir Paul McDamnedCartney, but hey, it's not like I had money on it)
When there are Names involved, the Oscar usually goes to the one who the Academy thinks would produce the cooler acceptance speech. Witness Bob Dylan's win last year, y'know?
It's not that I dislike Randy Newman. I like much of his music. I've never met the man, but you know, if one of his daughters came to my house with an order form for Girl Scout Cookies, I'd be pleased to sign up for six boxes of Thin Mints in gratitude for songs like "When She Loved Me," instead of sending her straight home with a sharply-worded note regarding his blatant overuse of the same ham-fisted piano-thudding melody in movie after movie.
Okay.
So let's knock Randy Newman off the list just for spite. Also because he probably can't beat the rest of these guys. James Horner is in with a chance, but will probably be overwhelmed by competition from Williams and Shore. Williams' biggest competition is Williams himself. I preferred his "A.I." score to that of "Harry Potter," but was "A.I." in theaters long enough for anyone to actually hear it? It's possible that a vote for "A.I." will actually benefit "Lord Of The Rings," leaving Shore the beneficiary of a split John Williams vote.
Good God, I had to type "Amélie" like a gazillion times in making these lists of nominees. And it hasn't had a stapling-machine's chance in Patagonia in any of these races. How the bloody hell did it even get this many nominations?
"Sound and Sound Editing." Supposedly, the "Best Sound" winner is the picture that had the best total "sound picture." Close your eyes during the movie; do you believe that you're actually in a mossy forest in Middle-Earth? That makes "Lord Of The Rings" the winner. If you were actually in the theater for "Moulin Rouge," that probably should be marked as a strike against.
It's a hard race to call because this category is being voted upon by the entire Academy. Do they know the difference between Best Sound and Best Sound Editing? Do they know the difference between these two categories and an egg-salad sandwich? Hard to say.
"Black Hawk Down" and "Pearl Harbor" both have ample opportunities for laying in sound, but they're more about 'splosions and ack-ack-ack-acks and sssHHHHPOW! K'BLOOOMM! and that sort of stuff. "Lord Of The Rings" is (usually) a more consistently subtle sound picture. You'd think that this would make it the standout, right?
And "Sound Editing" is supposed to reward the laying in of actual sound effects. So here you zoom in on the nominee with the most, the loudest, and the coolest 'splosions. We write down "Pearl Harbor" and then move straight ahead, not looking back.